|
|
| |
| |
|
No Need of Download, Experience the
Online Demo of
Email and Most Powerful Admin Control ;
LIVE! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Email
Tips |
Here are
some things to consider when you wonder whether or not
to save e-mail, particularly in light of the federal
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which imposes more
requirements on mostly public companies to preserve
records. Obviously, if you still have questions, talk to
a lawyer.
|
1.
Save important records. But e-mail is not always
considered a record. Companies should save records
of business transactions. If you sign a contract,
save that contract. If you receive the contract as
an attachment to an e-mail, and the other party says
in the e-mail, "We accept the contract," save the
e-mail too. That constitutes a record. So if you would keep it as a paper document, keep
the e-mail. Otherwise, pitch it. That includes
e-mails generated during the contract process. This
is work-in-progress material, and does not reflect
the thinking of an organization. Rather, they are
the thoughts of individuals.
|
|
2.
When you do keep something, store it formally.
Don't leave it in your e-mail program where no one can
find it. You might be best off to print it and put it in
a folder.
Sometimes, keep more. There are certain times in
which you cannot discard things. For instance, if you
are part of a legal process, you can't delete anything
that is relevant. I`d err on the side of caution. Better
yet, follow your lawyer's advice.
Even if you are not currently in a legal process,
there are two other important words: imminent and
foreseeable. If you're on notice that you'll be
indicted, things are imminent. Now is not a good time to
clean out your e-mails. If you make a big boo-boo and
somebody gets hurt, a lawsuit is foreseeable. Again, be
careful. Talk to your lawyer. According to Skupsky, only
the securities industry is required to keep all of its
e-mails. But the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has added
considerably to the record-keeping burden of some
companies — mostly public companies or companies who do
business with public companies. (For more on Sarbanes-Oxley`s
effect on private companies, see this article. |
|
3.
Again, if you think you may be affected by
Sarbanes-Oxley, see your lawyer.But don`t keep
everything. Most likely, those e-mails piling up
probably won`t hurt anything (except your server space).
Most of us get into business because we see an
unanswered need. We want to help our customers. We`ve
never been sued, and never expect to be.
However, it could very well happen. Let's say that,
after exercising superhuman patience, you fire Joe
Screwup. You could not have treated Screwup better, but,
of course, he doesn't see it that way. So Screwup sues.
You're not worried. But then you get a subpoena,
ordering you to submit any e-mail from the past three
years that bears on the case. There`s nothing in the
e-mail that would affect the case, and Screwup knows it.
But you'll have to dig up everything you have, and your
lawyer will go through it, looking for relevant
material. How many hours, at $200 per hour, will it take
her to do that? So you swallow hard and give Screwup
$15,000 to go away. You may never have thought about
this, but you can bet that the plaintiffs` bar has.
Worse, maybe they find an e-mail in which you express
intemperate remarks. The e-mail was probably
meaningless, but Screwup`s attorney will make you look
like Adolf Hitler.
|
|
4. Given
the potential problems, why save e-mail? Sure, this
scenario is pretty unlikely. But 99.9% of your old
e-mail is junk, anyway. Why take the risk? Develop a
policy on e-mail retention. Skupsky recommends a
personal 30-day deadline for taking action. After 30
days, your employees (and you) have to decide if an
e-mail is a record. If not, it goes. This has the
salutary effect of forcing your employees to think about
what a record is, and is not. Attorney Chuck Fine thinks
that's a good idea. But he goes further, and chucks (no
pun intended) his e-mail immediately.
Don't back
up your e-mail. This is no different than keeping it on
your computer. If you're subpoenaed, you and your lawyer
will have to go through it, whether it's on the computer
or on tape. Delete the old stuff.
According to
Skupsky, old e-mail is rarely useful to the other side.
But if it costs $50,000 to go through it, the plaintiff
doesn't care. Neither does his lawyer. They have nothing
to lose. Discovery is a wonderful weapon to force a
settlement.
So I'm cleaning out my old e-mails.
No, really! It's difficult, though. I've had them so
long, they're like old pals. You should clean out yours,
too. We have to be strong about this.
|
|
Next |
|